7.1 Impact Cratering
7.1.1 Volcanic Versus Impact Origin of Craters
The Moon provides an important benchmark for understanding the history of our planetary system. Most solid worlds show the effects of impacts, often extending back to the era when a great deal of debris from our system’s formation process was still present. On Earth, this long history has been erased by our active geology. On the Moon, in contrast, most of the impact history is preserved. If we can understand what has happened on the Moon, we may be able to apply this knowledge to other worlds. The Moon is especially interesting because it is not just any moon, but our Moon—a nearby world that has shared the history of Earth for more than 4 billion years and preserved a record that, for Earth, has been destroyed by our active geology.
Until the middle of the twentieth century, scientists did not generally recognize that lunar craters were the result of impacts. Since impact craters are extremely rare on Earth, geologists did not expect them to be the major feature of lunar geology. They reasoned (perhaps unconsciously) that since the craters we have on Earth are volcanic, the lunar craters must have a similar origin.
One of the first geologists to propose that lunar craters were the result of impacts was Grove K. Gilbert, a scientist with the US Geological Survey in the 1890s. He pointed out that the large lunar craters—mountain-rimmed, circular features with floors generally below the level of the surrounding plains—are larger and have different shapes from known volcanic craters on Earth. Terrestrial volcanic craters are smaller and deeper and almost always occur at the tops of volcanic mountains (Figure 7.1). The only alternative to explain the Moon’s craters was an impact origin. His careful reasoning, although not accepted at the time, laid the foundations for the modern science of lunar geology.
At these speeds, the energy of impact produces a violent explosion that excavates a large volume of material in a symmetrical way. Photographs of bomb and shell craters on Earth confirm that explosion craters are always essentially circular. Only following World War I did scientists recognize the similarity between impact craters and explosion craters, but, sadly, Gilbert did not live to see his impact hypothesis widely accepted.
7.1.2 The Cratering Process
Let’s consider how an impact at these high speeds produces a crater. When such a fast projectile strikes a planet, it penetrates two or three times its own diameter before stopping. During these few seconds, its energy of motion is transferred into a shock wave (which spreads through the target body) and into heat (which vaporizes most of the projectile and some of the surrounding target). The shock wave fractures the rock of the target planetary body, while the expanding silicate vapor generates an explosion similar to that of a nuclear bomb detonated at ground level (Figure 7.2). The size of the excavated crater depends primarily on the speed of impact, but generally it is 10 to 15 times the diameter of the projectile.
7.1.3 Crater Morphology
Although an impact event will always leave behind a hole—or crater (the word “crater” comes from the Greek word for “bowl”)—in the ground, what that hole looks like (i.e., its morphology) depends on a variety of factors. These factors include the speed, size, and strength of the impactor, the composition of the ground and impactor, the angle of the impact, and the gravity on the target planetary body. There are three crater morphology categories. Listed in order of increasing diameter, these are: simple craters, complex craters, and peak-ring/multi-ring basins.

Ask Yourself
Compare and contrast each crater type by closely examining both the spacecraft images and cross-sections in Figure 7.3. How would you describe the shape/appearance of each one? How are their features similar and how are they different? We will discuss this further in lecture.
Seeing for Yourself: Observing the Moon
The Moon is one of the most beautiful sights in the sky, and it is the only object close enough to reveal its topography (surface features such as mountains and valleys) without a visit from a spacecraft. A fairly small amateur telescope easily shows craters and mountains on the Moon as small as a few kilometers across.
Even as seen through a good pair of binoculars, we can observe that the appearance of the Moon’s surface changes dramatically with its phase. At full phase, it shows almost no topographic detail, and you must look closely to see more than a few craters. This is because sunlight illuminates the surface straight on, and in this flat lighting, no shadows are cast. Much more revealing is the view near first or third quarter, when sunlight streams in from the side, causing topographic features to cast sharp shadows. It is almost always more rewarding to study a planetary surface under such oblique lighting, when the maximum information about surface relief can be obtained.
The flat lighting at full phase does, however, accentuate brightness contrasts on the Moon, such as those between the maria (the large, dark volcanic plains) and highlands. Notice in Figure 7.5 that several of the large mare craters seem to be surrounded by white material and that the light streaks or rays that can stretch for hundreds of kilometers across the surface are clearly visible. These lighter features are ejecta, splashed out from the crater-forming impact.
Text Attributions
This text of this chapter is adapted from:
- Section 9.3 of OpenStax’s Astronomy 2e (2022) by Andrew Fraknoi, David Morrison, and Sidney Wolff. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. Access full book for free at this link.
Media Attributions
- Figure 7.3: Melosh, H. J. Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process. Oxford University Press, 1988.
the study of the shape and structure of landforms