"

7.1 Impact Cratering

7.1.1 Volcanic Versus Impact Origin of Craters

The Moon provides an important benchmark for understanding the history of our planetary system. Most solid worlds show the effects of impacts, often extending back to the era when a great deal of debris from our system’s formation process was still present. On Earth, this long history has been erased by our active geology. On the Moon, in contrast, most of the impact history is preserved. If we can understand what has happened on the Moon, we may be able to apply this knowledge to other worlds. The Moon is especially interesting because it is not just any moon, but our Moon—a nearby world that has shared the history of Earth for more than 4 billion years and preserved a record that, for Earth, has been destroyed by our active geology.

Until the middle of the twentieth century, scientists did not generally recognize that lunar craters were the result of impacts. Since impact craters are extremely rare on Earth, geologists did not expect them to be the major feature of lunar geology. They reasoned (perhaps unconsciously) that since the craters we have on Earth are volcanic, the lunar craters must have a similar origin.

One of the first geologists to propose that lunar craters were the result of impacts was Grove K. Gilbert, a scientist with the US Geological Survey in the 1890s. He pointed out that the large lunar craters—mountain-rimmed, circular features with floors generally below the level of the surrounding plains—are larger and have different shapes from known volcanic craters on Earth. Terrestrial volcanic craters are smaller and deeper and almost always occur at the tops of volcanic mountains (Figure 7.1). The only alternative to explain the Moon’s craters was an impact origin. His careful reasoning, although not accepted at the time, laid the foundations for the modern science of lunar geology.

Profiles of Volcanic and Impact Craters Illustrated. At left is a terrestrial volcano. It is tall, steeply sloped with a shallow crater at the top. At right is a Lunar impact crater. Not as tall as a terrestrial volcano, nor as steeply sloped. The crater has a very wide, flat floor and a central peak.
Figure 7.1: Volcanic and Impact Craters. Profiles of a typical terrestrial volcanic crater and a typical lunar impact crater are quite different. (credit: Andrew Fraknoi, David Morrison, and Sidney Wolff)
Gilbert concluded that the lunar craters were produced by impacts, but he didn’t understand why all of them were circular and not oval. The reason lies in the escape velocity—the minimum speed that a body must reach to permanently break away from the gravity of another body; it is also the minimum speed that a projectile approaching Earth or the Moon will hit with. Attracted by the gravity of the larger body, the incoming chunk strikes with at least escape velocity, which is 11 kilometers per second for Earth and 2.4 kilometers per second (5400 miles per hour) for the Moon. To this escape velocity is added to whatever speed the projectile already had with respect to Earth or Moon, typically 10 kilometers per second or more.

At these speeds, the energy of impact produces a violent explosion that excavates a large volume of material in a symmetrical way. Photographs of bomb and shell craters on Earth confirm that explosion craters are always essentially circular. Only following World War I did scientists recognize the similarity between impact craters and explosion craters, but, sadly, Gilbert did not live to see his impact hypothesis widely accepted.

7.1.2 The Cratering Process

Let’s consider how an impact at these high speeds produces a crater. When such a fast projectile strikes a planet, it penetrates two or three times its own diameter before stopping. During these few seconds, its energy of motion is transferred into a shock wave (which spreads through the target body) and into heat (which vaporizes most of the projectile and some of the surrounding target). The shock wave fractures the rock of the target planetary body, while the expanding silicate vapor generates an explosion similar to that of a nuclear bomb detonated at ground level (Figure 7.2). The size of the excavated crater depends primarily on the speed of impact, but generally it is 10 to 15 times the diameter of the projectile.

Illustration of the Stages in the Formation of an Impact Crater. In (a) an object is drawn just about to strike the surface of the Moon. In (b) the impact occurs. The explosion is shown lifting material upward and also sending shock waves down into the Moon. In (c) the impact progresses as the projectile itself disintegrates in the explosion and the shock waves penetrate further into the Moon. Finally, in (d) the ejected material has fallen back, leaving a walled, ejecta-filled impact crater.
Figure 7.2: Stages in the Formation of an Impact Crater. (a) The impact occurs. (b) The projectile vaporizes and a shock wave spreads through the lunar rock. (c) Ejecta are thrown out of the crater. (d) Most of the ejected material falls back to fill the crater, but some of it is found outside the crater in the form of an ejecta blanket. (credit: Andrew Fraknoi, David Morrison, and Sidney Wolff)
We break up the impact cratering process into three major stages: (1) contact and compression, (2) excavation, and (3) modification. Read more about these stages and learn about the lines of evidence scientists use to identify impact craters by reading the Impact Crater Wikipedia page.

7.1.3 Crater Morphology

Although an impact event will always leave behind a hole—or crater (the word “crater” comes from the Greek word for “bowl”)—in the ground, what that hole looks like (i.e., its morphology) depends on a variety of factors. These factors include the speed, size, and strength of the impactor, the composition of the ground and impactor, the angle of the impact, and the gravity on the target planetary body. There are three crater morphology categories. Listed in order of increasing diameter, these are: simple craters, complex craters, and peak-ring/multi-ring basins.

Figure 7.3: (left) Image of an unnamed simple crater on Mars [Source: Image from NASA/JPL/University of Arizona] (Middle) Image of Tycho Crater, a complex crater, on the Moon. [Source: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center/Arizona State University] (Right) Image of the ~950 km-wide Orientale basin on the Moon, which is considered a multi-ring basin. [Source: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center/Arizona State University] Cross-sections associated with each crater type are also shown under each image [Source: Cross-section modified from Melosh, 1989]

Ask Yourself

Compare and contrast each crater type by closely examining both the spacecraft images and cross-sections in Figure 7.3. How would you describe the shape/appearance of each one? How are their features similar and how are they different? We will discuss this further in lecture.

While the three crater morphologies do indeed look different, they all still exhibit common features, like raised rims, a crater floor, crater walls, and ejecta blankets and rays. The rim of the crater is turned up by the force of the explosion, so it rises above both the floor and the adjacent terrain. Surrounding the rim is an ejecta blanket consisting of material thrown out by the explosion. This debris falls back to create a rough, hilly region, typically about as wide as the crater diameter. Additionally, higher-speed ejecta fall at greater distances from the crater, often digging small secondary craters where they strike the surface (Figure 7.4).
Photograph of a Lunar Mare. Image of Mare Imbrium taken from Lunar orbit showing the smooth, little cratered surface typical of maria.
Figure 7.4: Lunar Maria. About 17% of the Moon’s surface consists of the maria—flat plains of basaltic lava. This view of Mare Imbrium also shows numerous secondary craters and evidence of material ejected from the large crater Copernicus on the upper horizon. Copernicus is an impact crater almost 100 kilometers in diameter that was formed long after the lava in Imbrium had already been deposited. (credit: NASA, Apollo 17)
Some of these streams of ejecta can extend for hundreds or even thousands of kilometers from the crater, creating the bright crater rays that are prominent in lunar photos taken near full phase. The brightest lunar crater rays are associated with large young craters such as Kepler and Tycho. Learn more about ejecta rays by reading the Seeing for Yourself: Observing the Moon box below.

Seeing for Yourself: Observing the Moon

The Moon is one of the most beautiful sights in the sky, and it is the only object close enough to reveal its topography (surface features such as mountains and valleys) without a visit from a spacecraft. A fairly small amateur telescope easily shows craters and mountains on the Moon as small as a few kilometers across.

Even as seen through a good pair of binoculars, we can observe that the appearance of the Moon’s surface changes dramatically with its phase. At full phase, it shows almost no topographic detail, and you must look closely to see more than a few craters. This is because sunlight illuminates the surface straight on, and in this flat lighting, no shadows are cast. Much more revealing is the view near first or third quarter, when sunlight streams in from the side, causing topographic features to cast sharp shadows. It is almost always more rewarding to study a planetary surface under such oblique lighting, when the maximum information about surface relief can be obtained.

The flat lighting at full phase does, however, accentuate brightness contrasts on the Moon, such as those between the maria (the large, dark volcanic plains) and highlands. Notice in Figure 7.5 that several of the large mare craters seem to be surrounded by white material and that the light streaks or rays that can stretch for hundreds of kilometers across the surface are clearly visible. These lighter features are ejecta, splashed out from the crater-forming impact.

Photographs of the Moon at Different Phases. In figure (a) the Moon is illuminated from the right. Shadows from crater walls stand out sharply along the terminator, and the contrast between the highlands and maria is low. Figure (b) shows the full Moon. No shadows are seen, and the contrast between the highlands and maria is high.
Figure 7.5: Appearance of the Moon at Different Phases. (a) Illumination from the side brings craters and other topographic features into sharp relief, as seen on the far left side. (b) At full phase, there are no shadows, and it is more difficult to see such features. However, the flat lighting at full phase brings out some surface features, such as the bright rays of ejecta that stretch out from a few large young craters. (credit: modification of work by Luc Viatour) By the way, there is no danger in looking at the Moon with binoculars or telescopes. The reflected sunlight is never bright enough to harm your eyes. In fact, the sunlit surface of the Moon has about the same brightness as a sunlit landscape of dark rock on Earth. Although the Moon looks bright in the night sky, its surface is, on average, much less reflective than Earth’s, with its atmosphere and white clouds. This difference is nicely illustrated by the photo of the Moon passing in front of Earth taken from the Deep Space Climate Observatory spacecraft (Figure 7.6). Since the spacecraft took the image from a position inside the orbit of Earth, we see both objects fully illuminated (full Moon and full Earth). By the way, you cannot see much detail on the Moon because the exposure has been set to give a bright image of Earth, not the Moon.
Image of the Moon Crossing the Face of the Earth. The dark disk of the Moon lies in front of the bright, cloud covered Earth illustrating the difference in relative brightness between the two bodies.
Figure 7.6: The Moon Crossing the Face of Earth. In this 2015 image from the Deep Space Climate Observatory spacecraft, both objects are fully illuminated, but the Moon looks darker because it has a much lower average reflectivity than Earth. (credit: modification of work by NASA, DSCOVR EPIC team) One interesting thing about the Moon that you can see without binoculars or telescopes is popularly called “the new Moon in the old Moon’s arms.” Look at the Moon when it is a thin crescent, and you can often make out the faint circle of the entire lunar disk, even though the sunlight shines on only the crescent. The rest of the disk is illuminated not by sunlight but by earthlight—sunlight reflected from Earth. The light of the full Earth on the Moon is about 50 times brighter than that of the full Moon shining on Earth.


Text Attributions

This text of this chapter is adapted from:

Media Attributions

  • Figure 7.3: Melosh, H. J. Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process. Oxford University Press, 1988.
definition