34 John Locke (1632-1704): Empiricism

 

Locke
Although he completed a philosophical education at Oxford, John Locke declined the offer of a permanent academic position in order to avoid committing himself to a religious order. Having also studied medicine, he served for many years as private physician and secretary to Anthony Ashley Cooper, the first Earl of Shaftesbury and one of the Lord Proprietors of the Carolina Colonies. Locke’s involvement with this controversial political figure led to a period of self-imposed exile in Holland during the 1680s, but after the Glorious Revolution of 1688 he held several minor governmental offices. A friend of Isaac Newton and Robert Boyle, Locke was also an early member of the Royal Society. He studied and wrote on philosophical, scientific, and political matters throughout his life, in a voluminous correspondence and
ample journals, but the public works for which he is best known were published in a single, sudden burst.
LockeThe fundamental principles of Locke’s philosophy are presented in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), the culmination of twenty years of reflection on the origins of human knowledge. According to Locke, what we know is always properly understood as he relation between ideas, and he devoted much of the Essay to an extended argument that all of our ideas simple or complex are ultimately derived from experience.
The consequence of this empiricist approach is that the knowledge of which we are capable is severely limited in its scope and certainty.
Locke
Our knowledge of material substances, for example, depends heavily on the secondary qualities by reference to which we name them, while their real inner natures derive from the primary qualities of their insensible parts. Nevertheless, Locke held that we have no grounds for complaint about the limitations of our knowledge, since a proper application of our cognitive capacities is enough to guide our action in the practical conduct of life. The Essay brought great fame, and Locke spent much of the rest of his life responding to admirers and critics by making revisions in later editions of the book, including detailed accounts of human volition and moral freedom, the personal identity on which our responsibility as moral agents depends, and the dangers of religious enthusiasm. One additional section that was never included in the Essay itself is Of the Conduct of the Understanding, a practical guide to the achievement of useful beliefs about the world.
Locke
The bachelor philosopher’s notions about childrearing appeared in Some Thoughts concerning Education (1693). By contrast, Locke chose to avoid controversy by publishing his political writings anonymously. With the Two Treatises of Civil Government (1690) Locke established himself as a political theorist of the highest order. The First Treatise is a detailed refutation of the (now-forgotten) monarchist theories of Robert Filmer, but the Second Treatise of Government offers a systematic account of the foundations of political obligation. On Locke’s view, all rights begin in the individual property interest created by an investment of labor.
The social structure or commonwealth, then, depends for its formation and maintenance on the express consent of those who are governed by its political powers.
Majority rule thus becomes the cornerstone of all political order, and dissatisfied citizens reserve a lasting right to revolution. Similarly, Locke’s
Letter Concerning Toleration (1689) argued for a broad (though not limitless) acceptance of alternative religious convictions.
Recommended Reading:

Primary sources:

  • John Locke, Works (Clarendon, 1975- )
  • John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. by Peter H. Nidditch (Clarendon, 1989)
  • John Locke, Some Thoughts Concerning Education and of the Conduct of the Understanding, ed. by Ruth W. Grant and Nathan Tarcov (Hackett, 1996)
  • John Locke, Two Treatises of Government, ed. by Peter Laslett (Cambridge, 1988)
  • John Locke, A Letter Concerning Toleration (Prometheus Books, 1990)

Secondary sources:

  • Richard I. Aaron, John Locke (Clarendon, 1971)
  • Nicholas Jolley, Locke: His Philosophical Thought (Oxford, 1999)
  • John W. Yolton, Locke and the Way of Ideas (St. Augustine, 1993)
  • The Cambridge Companion to Locke, ed. by Vere Chappell (Cambridge, 1994)
  • Locke on Human Understanding, ed. by I. C. Tiption (Oxford, 1977)
  • Locke’s Philosophy: Content and Context, ed. by G. A. J. Rogers (Oxford, 1997)
  • Michael Ayers, Locke: Epistemology and Ontology (Routledge, 1994)
  • John L. Mackie, Problems from Locke (Oxford, 1976)
  • Michael Ayers, Locke (Routledge, 1999)
  • John Locke: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding in Focus, ed. by Gary Fuller, Robert Stecker, and John P. Wright (Routledge, 2000)
  • E. J. Lowe, Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Locke on Human Understanding (Routledge, 1995)
  • David L. Thomas, Locke on Government (Routledge, 1995)
  • David Lloyd Thomas, Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Locke on Government (Routledge, 1995)
  • Jeremy Waldron , God, Locke and Equality: Christian Foundations of Locke’s Political Thought (Cambridge, 2002)
  • Ross Harrison, Hobbes, Locke, and Confusion’s Masterpiece: An Examination of Seventeenth Century Philosophy (Cambridge, 2002)

Additional on-line information about Locke includes:

 

Creative Commons License
The Philosophy Pages by Garth Kemerling are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.philosophypages.com/referral/contact.htm.

1997, 2011 Garth Kemerling.
Last modified 23 November 2011.
Questions, comments, and suggestions may be sent to: the Contact Page.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Philosophy-A Short History3 Copyright © by Lumen Learning is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Feedback/Errata

Comments are closed.