46 Evaluating OER Checklist
OER________________________________ Professor_____________________________ Date___________________
Criteria |
Considerations |
Notes/Feedback |
Clarity, Comprehensibility, and Readability
|
The content, including any instructions and exercises, is clear and comprehensible to students at the level I teach. The content is consistent with its language and formatting (e.g. key terms are bold). The content is well-organized in terms of sequencing and flow. |
|
Content and Technical Accuracy
|
The content is accurate based on my expertise. There are few to no factual, grammatical, or typographical errors present in the material. The content’s interface is navigable for students. |
|
Adaptability and Modularity
|
The resource is available in a file format which allows for adaptations, modifications, rearrangements, and updates as necessary. The resource can be easily divided into modules, or sections, which can be used or rearranged out of their original order. The content is available under an open license which allows for modifications |
|
Student and Course Alignment
|
The content is presented at a reading level appropriate for my students. The content aligns fairly well with my course learning objectives The content is available at a level appropriate for use in my course. I can successfully integrate the content into an activity or assignment that uses active learning strategies |
|
Accessibility
|
|
|
Evaluating OER Checklist Word doc
This guide is remixed from:
https://iastate.pressbooks.pub/oerstarterkit/chapter/evaluating-oer/